Which of the following best describes the goal of intermediate sanctions?

The goal of intermediate sanctions is best characterized by their function as a less-costly and more effective alternative to traditional methods of punishment, such as incarceration. Intermediate sanctions include a variety of approaches, such as probation, intensive supervision, and community service, which offer alternatives aimed at reducing the population in prisons while still holding offenders accountable for their actions.

This approach allows for a more tailored response to criminal behavior, taking into account individual circumstances and the severity of the offense. By utilizing intermediate sanctions, the correctional system can manage offenders in a way that minimizes costs associated with prison management, such as housing, food, and healthcare for incarcerated individuals. Furthermore, these alternatives can lead to better rehabilitation outcomes by integrating offenders back into the community with support, reducing recidivism rates and enhancing public safety.

In contrast, the other options either misrepresent the cost implications or the underlying philosophy of intermediate sanctions. They do not align with the intention to reduce reliance on costly incarceration while still effectively managing offenders.