Which of the following represents the least expensive option for sanctions?

House arrest is considered the least expensive option for sanctions because it typically involves minimal supervision and allows individuals to serve their sentences in the comfort of their own homes, reducing costs associated with housing and maintaining facilities. Unlike prison, which incurs substantial costs for security, maintenance, and daily operations, or halfway houses that require staffing and support services, house arrest minimizes state expenditures significantly.

By using electronic monitoring or check-ins, house arrest can effectively supervise individuals without the financial burden of full-time custody. This model not only alleviates overcrowded prison conditions but also allows individuals to maintain job stability and family connections, potentially facilitating their eventual reintegration into society while keeping expenses low.

Boot camps can often involve structured programs that require considerable resources and staff, making them more expensive than house arrest. Thus, the financial implications of each option highlight why house arrest stands out as the most economical choice for sanctions.