Which percentage represents the rate at which judges impose a suspended sentence that is pending good behavior?

The rate at which judges impose a suspended sentence contingent upon good behavior is a reflection of judicial discretion and practice in the criminal justice system. This option suggests that judges in a significant portion of cases, specifically 22%, choose to suspend sentences, allowing offenders the opportunity to avoid serving time in custody as long as they adhere to certain conditions, primarily maintaining good behavior.

This practice serves multiple purposes: it alleviates overcrowding in correctional facilities, promotes rehabilitation by allowing offenders to remain in the community with supervision, and incentivizes compliance with the law. The decision to impose a suspended sentence is often influenced by factors such as the nature of the offense, the offender's criminal history, and the likelihood of rehabilitation. The 22% figure aligns with observed trends in sentencing practices, showcasing a balance between punishment and the potential for reform.

In contrast, the other percentages presented likely represent less common outcomes in sentencing decisions or reflect different judicial approaches, thus indicating the specificity and nuance of the judicial system's response to crime.